Editorial Policy

GreenShift Intelligence exists to turn fragmented sustainability information into useful intelligence for industry. Our editorial approach separates source-grounded facts from GreenShift interpretation.

Source hierarchy

We prefer primary sources such as regulators, standards bodies, registries, official company disclosures, legislation, consultation documents and original research. Secondary sources may be used for context where appropriate.

Facts first, interpretation second

Articles should distinguish what happened from why GreenShift believes it matters. Material factual claims should be traceable to the source identified in the article. Where information is uncertain, preliminary or under consultation, we aim to say so.

Corrections

If we discover a material error, we aim to correct it promptly. Readers and organisations can send correction requests, supporting evidence or clarifications to hello@greenshiftintel.com.

Commercial independence

Paid partnerships, sponsored research, advertisements and partner content must be clearly identified. Payment does not buy favourable editorial conclusions. We reserve the right to decline, edit or label commercial material to protect reader clarity and editorial credibility.

Conflicts and company participation

Companies may provide factual information for profiles or research. GreenShift may verify, edit, contextualise or decline supplied information. Participation in a profile, report or event does not guarantee positive coverage.